The basic prejudices against Sri Aurobindo in the West stem primarily from a long-standing intellectual tradition that prioritizes materialism, empirical science, and analytical reason over subjective spiritual experience, metaphysics, and mysticism.
Here are the underlying prejudices that often lead to the dismissal of his work:
- Materialism vs. Spirituality: Western thought, particularly in academic philosophy and politics, tends to have a materialistic or secular foundation. Sri Aurobindo's emphasis on a pervasive "Spirit" (Brahman) as the sole reality, and the goal of a complete spiritual transformation of earthly life, is fundamentally at odds with this worldview.
- Rationality as the Sole Arbiter of Truth: There is a strong bias in the West towards knowledge verifiable through the rational mind and sensory experience. Sri Aurobindo argues that human reason is imperfect and limited in scope, and that true knowledge (integral knowledge) comes from a higher, suprarational consciousness. This challenges the perceived supremacy of Western rationality.
- "Mysticism" as Anti-Intellectual: The term "mysticism" in the West often carries a connotation of being vague, irrational, or unscientific. Sri Aurobindo's ideas are often quickly categorized this way, allowing them to be dismissed without serious philosophical engagement, as they fall outside the established boundaries of what is considered "legitimate" philosophy.
- Post-Colonial and Orientalist Bias: A lingering post-colonial bias sometimes influences the reception of Indian philosophy in the West. Indian philosophical traditions were historically devalued during the colonial era as "steeped in religion" and lacking true intellectual rigor compared to Western secular philosophy. This historical prejudice can affect the current academic reception of thinkers like Sri Aurobindo.
- Critique of Western Systems: Sri Aurobindo was a significant critic of Western political and social systems, which he saw as mechanistic, materialistic, and leading to social fragmentation. This critique, which proposes a non-Western, spiritually informed model of governance and development, can be viewed as incompatible or idealistic from within Western secular frameworks.
- Utopianism vs. Pragmatism: The vision of an "ideal human unity" achieved through a radical spiritual evolution is often dismissed as utopian and impractical. Critics argue that such a profound shift in human consciousness is unachievable in the face of immediate crises and entrenched power structures, lacking concrete strategies for short-term problems.
These prejudices form a cultural and intellectual barrier, causing his sophisticated and logical framework to be characterized simply as "mystical" and overlooked by mainstream Western discourse. - GoogleAI
Engaging Religio-Cultural Nationalism
S Thompson - The Other Lutherans: Voices from the Global South, 2026
Why is an Evangelical Catholic Witness of Justification Important for the Global South?
AL García - The Other Lutherans: Voices from the Global South, 2026
Transdiasporic Indo-Caribbean Anthologies and Post-Amnesia Jahaji Bhai (n)
J Bhai - The Asian Caribbean in the Caribbean Diaspora …, 2026
[PDF] From Assimilation to Resistance: Body, Identity and Intersectionality in Ghoul (2018)
B Sinha, A Dirghangi - AM Journal of Art and Media Studies, 2025
This paper critically examines the intersections of gender, religion, and social politics through the character of Nida Rahim in the Indian Netflix miniseries Ghoul (2018). Through the protagonist, it analyzes a struggle for bodily autonomy and identity in a …
Secularization, Social Order, and World History: Toward a Global Perspective
KN Flatt - 2025
… But global varieties of secular order encountered resistance in the latter part of the twentieth century, from the spread of the Muslim Brotherhood to the Iranian Revolution, and from the rising power of Hindutva in India to the renaissance of …
[HTML] Harsh Mander: The incomplete dream of constitutional socialism in free India
H Mander - 2025
… The result is that democracy, socialism, egalitarianism, federalism and secularism are all sacrificed on the later of the march of Hindutva and the interests of chosen crony capitalists. Without formally repudiating the constitution, the Hindutva- crony …
Why the Adivasi Will Not Dance
P Chakravorty
The title of this chapter is inspired by Hansda Sowvendra Shekhar’s book The Adivasi Will Not Dance: Stories (2015). He is an Adivasi author writing in English about the lives, cultures, and values of Adivasi life. 1 Although the author was writing …
[PDF] TASK FORCE ON ACADEMIC FREEDOM AND TENURE
MJ Dutta, A Brekke, T Discenna, TM Harris, K Johnson…
… Along these lines, academics challenging the Indian state’s implementation of the Hindutva ideology have faced attacks on their academic freedom, with their mobilities to India targeted. Collaborators of scholars internationally are targeted …
INHABITING THE IN-BETWEEN
V IYENGAR
… And given that the nature, history, and form of kathak make it extremely difficult and messy to co-opt into a majoritarian and narrow Hindutva narrative, are we looking toward a future where kathak itself will be estranged—excommunicated …
[PDF] CoVe in Indonesia: A Case Study of Composite Violent Extremism
AI Soemitro, M Syauqillah, IMW Wardhana - … Journal on Culture, History, and Religion, 2025
… Then, the prolonged Palestine-Kashmir conflict gave rise to the potential for convergence between ethnoreligious ideologies and aggressive nationalism, namely Zionism and Hindutva. The narrative of fear of Islam and past grievances is …
Collated by Tusar Nath Mohapatra
No comments:
Post a Comment